Joe Chiarenzelli is an editor on The Gadfly Press who cares way too much about television.
Sarah Baver
is a senior at St. Lawrence University in Canton, NY. When she isn't
watching The Walking Dead she is assessing zombies of the philosophical
kind in her honors thesis The Existential Zombie. Her research involves augmenting
the philosophical zombie thought experiment by placing it within the
existential framework of Albert Camus' The Myth of Sisyphus in order to
illustrate the relationship between the subjective experience that comprises the
phenomenal mind and the ability to make meaningful existence by way of one’s
own free choice.
Do you think these visions were a look into the mind of a man becoming a zombie or something like Rick viewing himself as acting like a feral walker? What are your thought's on Sunday night's episode? Leave them in the comments.
Joe:
Sarah, firstly I have
to get out of the way that opening montage scene. It was a perfect
juxtaposition of the sentimentality and brutality of human nature. On one hand
we have a beautiful burial and oration about Dale and see how his death has
made his point better than he was able to in life. On the other we have Shane
and some other folks (including a useful T-Dog , what is the world coming to?)
just pounding the unliving shit out of some zombies. Besides thematically
resonating, the special effects on the zombie beating were downright
disgusting. Everyone I watched this episode with was peeking through their
fingers each time someone raised their various farm implement to brain one of
them. But, onto the content.
Watching this episode
and last week's have made me immensely energized about just what the hell is
going to happen next. With the death of Dale, and now the death of Shane, the
group's whole moral spectrum has been upended. These were the two characters who
were the moral extremes of the group, with everyone else falling somewhere
in between. The plodding nature of the farm plot has been ramped up insanely.
Originally I viewed the farm as a safe haven which our survivors could retreat
to in between forays into town for supplies, which I viewed as a cop out. But
now we can see that the farm only served that purpose temporarily. What I think
is that the relative safety of the farm served to ramp up intragroup tension by
having removed the main threat from outside forces, with these past two
episodes releasing the tension. It’s also interesting how both Shane and Dale
ultimately move to their moral poles right before they die, Shane attempting to
kill Rick and Dale playing the advocate for Randall.
Now that these two
characters are removed, and with the ending of this episode, I think we are
headed towards a more group vs. zombies set of circumstances rather than an
intragroup antagonism situation. We see all sorts of signs of this in fact. The
mutual bonding between Glenn and Andrea over the RV clearly lacks subtlety but I
think that this type of character interaction is natural and fitting for how
those two have been growing. What do you think?
Sarah:
Joe, as you have highlighted,
this episode and last week’s episode have had us witness the deaths of two of
the most polarizing characters, Shane and Dale, respectively. Originally I
thought to simplify their two extremes as presenting a narrative of evil versus
good, but upon a closer analysis I realize that to do so would be to miss the
nuances of these characters and the influence their deaths will have on others
as the show progresses. Shane is not wholly evil – the dialogue between Lori
and Shane in last night’s episode demonstrated the compassion and love Shane is
capable of harboring and the good that can be wrought from it, e.g., being
responsible for keeping Lori and Carl alive during the first month of the
epidemic. While Shane is not wholly evil, the events that followed his
conversation with Lori revealed just how off-kilt his moral compass is.
Furthermore, it exhibited the chaotic, impulsive nature of Shane’s actions.
Perhaps if he had been more methodical with executing his plan to use Randall’s
escape as a way to frame Rick’s death he would have been successful. But his
plan quickly unraveled as both Daryl and Rick pieced everything together.
The culmination of
Daryl and Rick learning the true nature of Shane’s actions resulted in a
two-fold series of events. First, Daryl and Glenn realized that Randall had
transformed into a walker without being bitten; his cause of death was a broken
neck. While Daryl and Glenn did not fully state the conclusion of this
realization, it nonetheless served as the foundation of what Shane’s death
demonstrated at the close of the episode – that you do not need to be bitten in
order to turn; rather, as long as you die with no brain damage, you will
reanimate. This is certainly a crucial plot development, but one that does not
need to be elaborated on any further at this time. What does need to be
discussed further are the scenes of Shane’s death and of Carl shooting
Walker-Shane.
To return to an earlier
point, Shane’s death scene demonstrated that he is not wholly evil. While lying
on the ground bleeding out from the knife wound, Shane’s expression revealed a
man plagued with regret. He was forced to confront the gravity of his actions
through the realization that his death was imminent. The scene was crushing and
raw, and I don’t think we will see Rick grapple with its devastation until next
season.
The scene in which Carl
shoots Walker-Shane is as close as the series could have come to recreating the
scene in the graphic novel that depicts Shane’s death. The television series,
however, diverged significantly from the graphic novel in terms of the
implications on Carl’s character development by having him shoot Walker-Shane
instead of living Shane (as he does in
the graphic novel). This plot line seems to allow Carl to maintain a sharp
distinction between what he will do to walkers and what he will do to the living.
The way the plot has been structured leads me to think that Carl would not have
shot living Shane. But, the fact that Carl was the one to put Walker-Shane down
nevertheless marks a profound shift in Carl’s character development – he has
made a 180 from his line of thinking at the beginning of the episode in which
he exclaimed he would not need a gun because he wasn’t going to kill any
walkers. Not only has Carl now killed a walker, but he has also killed a walker
who was once one of his closest friends and role models.
A final note I want to
touch upon is the depiction of Daryl as the figure between the moral poles of
Shane and Dale. Daryl seems to possess the moral instinct of Dale while still
maintaining the survivalist instinct of Shane. Dale’s comment to Shane that he
was made for this new world could also be applied to Daryl, but with a caveat:
that Daryl represents what it means to be human in this new world (i.e., one
that challenges our conception of what it means to be human by presenting the contrast
of the reanimated dead) and not what it means to simply survive.
Joe:
Sarah, it’s interesting
to me that you peg Shane’s emotions as compassion. I’ve actually had this
discussion several times with people, I think that Shane’s seeming compassion,
while legitimate and true, is in fact part of a larger emotional set that
subsumes it. From my perspective, the course of the show has detailed how Shane is someone
that enjoys the newfound freedom afforded him by the breakdown of civilization. Any
pull he had on Lori and Carl was because he helped them immediately in the
aftermath of the virus and this forced their dependence on him, whether on purpose or by
circumstance. Then when that status was disrupted by the return of his partner
he worked to undermine the group and the Grimes’ family for his personal
advantage. I'm not saying he is a bad character per se, but I just think he
wasn't motivated by love so much as a thirst for power and his id. While that
could arguably be called compassion, I think compassion is a secondary characteristic
to his basal power thirst.
Even though I think that is the nature of Shane’s
motivation, it is still relatively obvious that Shane is unsure whether or not
he wants to kill Rick. He delayed and delayed shooting Rick for a long
conversation, which reeks of hesitation to me. But I think you’re right in
thinking that his face while he lay dying was the face of a man who didn’t
realize what his actions had set in motion. I also think you’re right about
Rick’s reaction being delayed until the next season, primarily due to the next
episodes seeming devotion to full on zombie antics. In my opinion, the only way
that Rick was ever going to kill someone was by doing what Shane did, backing
him into a corner. The look on his face immediately after he stabs Shane is
only intensified when he sees that Carl has witnessed his actions.
A fascinating element of Carl shooting zombie Shane rather
than how it played in the comic books, is whether or not Carl would have shot
Shane if he had arrived before Rick stabbed him. Both, Rick and Shane had
strong moments with Carl in the episode and I’m not entirely sure who he would
have sided with if he had gotten there moments earlier? The father who is a bit
of a bummer or the “uncle” who was clearly better at currying favor with Carl?
Some final things that
I found interesting were around the periphery of all of this. Am I right in
thinking that the zombie’s rising if an individual does not die via bite was what
Dr. Jenner told Rick as he was leaving the CDC? If that was not the information
he gave to Rick, then I have to wonder when this new paradigm of zombification
emerged. However, I am pretty sure that is what Jenner said. But if that’s
true, why has Rick kept this information from the rest of the group,
particularly Glenn who he seems to trust more than anyone else. Another thing,
where on earth did this showdown with Shane take place, close enough to the
farm that Carl can show up their randomly, but far enough away that they are
near a horde of zombies not previously spotted?
T-Dog watch: I counted
four or five lines this episode give or take the atrociously stereotypically scripted,
though seemingly obligate to this show’s writers, “Aw, hell no!”
Sarah:
Joe, your assessment of
Shane is not one I had considered, and you make a convincing case for reading
what seem as acts of compassion as expressions of his desire for power, or more
specifically, his desire to have someone become totally dependent upon him.
I think you’re also right in stating that the only
way Rick is going to kill another person is if that person backs him into a
corner. We saw this same element play out in the bar scene a few episodes back
as well. Related to Rick’s behavior in the bar scene, I think the fact that
Rick double-tapped the overweight side-kick by shooting him in the head after
he was already dead gives weight to the argument that what Dr. Jenner whispered
into Rick’s ear before the CDC explosion was that everyone is already infected
and so long as you die with your brain intact, you will reanimate. I had
originally thought that Dr. Jenner told Rick either that information about the
virus or that Lori was pregnant, which is information he could have gained from
the blood test (the tests seem now to have served as further evidence to Dr.
Jenner’s theory on the virus). The fact that Rick was surprised to learn Lori
was pregnant in an earlier episode meant that Dr. Jenner had not already told
him. This, coupled with the double-tapping at the bar, leads me to think that
Dr. Jenner told Rick everyone is already infected. But this still leaves the
question you raised about why Rick has not disclosed this information to
anyone, especially Glenn unanswered.
And I think that the
showdown between Rick and Shane took place close to the farmhouse, which
allowed Carl to see that something was going on through his binoculars. I
haven’t figured out why Shane would have led Rick to a spot so close to the
farmhouse, but perhaps it was further evidence of how hesitant Shane was to go
through with his plan to kill Rick. Perhaps he was unconsciously (or
consciously) hoping he would get caught.
Also, what was up with
those walker visions during Shane’s transformation? Was that from Rick’s
perspective or Shane’s? If the former, was it Rick contemplating what was
about to happen to his former best friend? If it was the latter, is that
something all people experience as they begin to reanimate? If so, what does
that mean for how the virus impacts a person’s level of
consciousness/awareness?
Do you think these visions were a look into the mind of a man becoming a zombie or something like Rick viewing himself as acting like a feral walker? What are your thought's on Sunday night's episode? Leave them in the comments.


No comments:
Post a Comment