By
Sean Ewart
While I cannot remember the exact
moment, I remember well the feeling I experienced when I first
thought to myself: I am comfortable with the idea there is no god.
The revelation that I could, after wrestling for years with the
overwhelming evidence that my conception of a higher power was at
best a fantasy, be at peace with the idea of a universe without god
was an immense relief. No more cognitive dissonance. Gone were the
days of attempting to reconcile the observable world with a book
written by men who were unaware, even, of the Americas.
Some
still call me a “seeker.” They believe that deep, deep down
inside I am still looking for something. I am told that my questions
are indicative of a quest for the very god that I deny; that my
rejection of god is merely the result of moral decay and a
miscalculated soul. And in a very real sense they are correct. I
surely am seeking for something. I have been seeking for something
since the day that my brain first began processing the data being
delivered to it by my various senses. Like all men and women who have
preceded me I am searching for a correct understanding of the world
in which I have, by an accident of chemistry, found myself. I am not
searching for god – I am searching for truth.
That,
in my estimation, is the best definition of a term that is truly
ridiculous. Yes, I am an atheist. But I am also an a-unicorn-ist and
an a-mermaid-ist. It is not that I do not believe in the possibility
of their existence – it is that I believe that possibility to be
unlikely. I am perfectly willing to believe in unicorns, mermaids,
fairies, angels, demons, gods, goddesses, and in the infallible truth
of the Star Wars saga given compelling, logical, and scientifically
vigorous evidence. But the evidence for any of those possibilities
is yet to be discovered. I am an
atheist – I do not believe in the existence of god – not as a
matter of dogma but as a matter of science. I am
simply unconvinced of the evidence.
This
incredulity is costly. I am, because of my failure to believe in the
infallibility of the scribbles of men writing thousands of years
before germ theory occurred to the upright and most hairless of apes,
a self-made member of a philosophical minority. Atheists are, in the
minds of most of the citizens of our global society, not to be
trusted, unpatriotic, immoral, and evil. We are accused of worshiping
science. It is said that we hate religion and love only ourselves. I
am asked to stop hurting people with my questions. Atheists are told
they are at war with religion.
But I
do not hate religion; I simply think religion is wrong. I do not
worship science anymore than anyone else who has ever ridden a
bicycle and trusted in momentum to keep them upright. If my questions
hurt anyone's sensibilities, they are welcomed to ignore them. Yet I
am slowly realizing we may well be at war with religion. I do not
mean a literal war. It seems, however, self evident that the growing
population of secularists, in America and across the globe, are
increasingly unwilling to live under the oppression of ignorance.
This is an ideological war that is being fought in ballot booths and
battle fields the world round. From the heated platforms of political
discourse in Washington D.C. to the bloody Tahrir Square in Cairo,
the lines are becoming clear.
Prior
to the modern age the world was divided between those who believed in
a certain religion and those who believed in another. Now the world
consists of those who believe in religion and those who do not. The
difference is that we secularists do not have books or visions
declaring it our duty to slaughter those who disagree with us. We do,
however, desire a world that is not ruled by the autocracy of
theocrats – be they dictators or a tyrannical majority – and we
are right to demand respect and equality under the law. Atheists and
our secular allies never declared war on religion. But we have been
tortured, killed, mistrusted, feared, discriminated against, hated,
and barred from public service for so long as to force us, now that
we have grown in numbers, to assert ourselves. The religious the
world round call this a war and have couched their terms in lead and
laws determined to stamp us out. Truly we are not fighting a war on
religion – as if we, the
atheist minority, are the instigators. Rather we are fighting a war
against religious oppression.
Atheists,
and secularists more generally, need a rallying cry. We are at the
cutting edge of a movement that threatens the very fabric of human
civilization so far. For the first time in history there is a
measurable amount of nonbelievers,
of people who are not living lives dictated by the random positions
of the stars or the babbles of men from Mecca. But like all progress
it is not irreversible. History is full of men of science pushing the
world forward and men of god pushing against them. So as we assert
ourselves let us be clear: we demand reasoned, evidence based
governance respecting the rights of believers and nonbelievers. We
are searching for truth, and ask to be respected even as we seek for
it outside the temples, mosques, and churches which serve as relics
of an outdated mentality. We are leading the atheist revolution –
the greatest period of intellectual and political upheaval since
the Renaissance.

I've always found the religious who use the argument that one cannot know that a deity *doesn't* exist to be aggravating.
ReplyDeleteIt's superfluous to argue the mere possibility of existence; we could go on all day making an infinite list of things that *could* exist. Anything that doesn't posit an abject contradiction has the possibility of existing(a square circle, on the other hand, we can dismiss outright).
This is why the burden of proof is so important. Extraordinary claims (such as positing the existence of an omnipotent deity) require the individual making the claim to provide evidence to validate said claim; It is disingenuous and dishonest to shift your burden of proof to the person skeptical of said extraordinary claim.