By
Allie Lane
I have to admit, I
never thought I would learn anything from watching golf. In fact, I’ve spent
most of my life considering the time I’ve spent watching PGA events with my Dad
as minutes and hours I’ll just never get back. This weekend, though, I learned
something from golf, and it was nothing good. The Masters was on; the top men
of the golf world were teeing off under the Georgia sun and everything was
green. Panoramic shots of the verdant loveliness played behind the CBS Sports
theme as it was announced that the 76th Annual Masters was sponsored
by IBM among other companies. This just washed over me. I’m an American kid
who’s used to athletics being fused with big business.
“Yeah, I wonder what
they’re going to do,” my mom said when the IBM logo came on the screen.
“What do you mean?” I
asked.
“Well, IBM has been
sponsoring the Masters for a long time, and it’s traditional that every year
the president of IBM gets invited to join the club at Augusta. Only now, the
president of IBM is a woman and Augusta doesn’t allow women to be members.”
“What?” I blinked
several times in disbelief. This was 2012. “Women aren’t allowed to play?”
“No,” my mother
clarified. “They can play there. They just aren’t allowed to be members.”
“That’s ridiculous. How
can they do that?” I raged from the couch.
My mother shrugged.
“It’s a private club full of Southern gentlemen who want it their way.”
The whole thing
astounded me, and I pride myself on being a realist who is very hard to
astound. I could not believe that something so heinously discriminatory was
going on in the 21st century. A part of me couldn’t even believe
that the PGA or companies like IBM were tying themselves to a place like that,
but as I thought about it, as I watched men in polo shirts stroll across
immaculate fairways, I realized I shouldn’t have been.
I experienced a similar
state of surprise when contraception popped up as a hot button issue on the
political scene not long ago. I knew that every conservative politician was
almost obligated to say they would attempt to overturn Roe vs. Wade, but the
idea that birth control shouldn’t be covered by insurance and the rhetoric that
said contraception was a societal evil seemed incomprehensible to me. Where had
this come from? For as long as I was aware of such things, it had seemed that
contraception was a thing American society had accepted. Of course, certain
religions spoke out against it, some conservative families I knew disavowed it,
but I never thought it was a right women were ever in danger of losing in this
day and age. These were the problems of my mother’s generation, weren’t they?
Aside from individually held prejudices and the lingering pay gap, women in
American were basically equal, weren’t they?
That’s where I was
wrong.
My ignorance, I
suppose, was a result of the environment I grew up in. I was raised by two
moderate, middle class parents who worked in education for most of my life. My
mother was always frank about puberty and sexuality when I was young, and, as I
grew older, told me stories of how she debated abortion with male friends in
the seventies and nearly always won. The same expectations for chores and
behavior were placed on both my older brother and me. I was raised a Christian,
but in a liberal protestant congregation with a female pastor. Apparently some
of the more conservative churches in the area thought we were a dubious,
blasphemous cell who preached that God was a woman. We were not. Even on the
playground, I was never excluded from any game because I was a girl. I was
never picked last for any team. Quite simply, I had never encountered any
prejudice, so I assumed there was really very little downside to being a girl
in modern American society.
That belief held until
I heard pundits saying that by expecting to have birth control coverage, women
were consequently expecting to be paid for sex, until I heard about Augusta,
where women still aren’t allowed to be members.
To add irony to insult,
this revelatory discovery of golfing discrimination came on the heels of
reading an article on college applications, which noted that it was harder for girls
to gain acceptance into institutions than for boys with equal qualifications.
Since a majority of those applying for and receiving college degrees are now girls,
a higher percentage of them are actually being turned away in favor of male
applicants. Because girls are now, on average, performing better in school,
many post secondary institutions seem to think that the American male needs a
leg up, needs to be given a chance against all those uber-intelligent females.
How, in a country where there is still a glaring gender pay gap, where certain
colleges have been ruled hostile environments for women, where the female
reproductive system is a political football, where literal boys clubs like
Augusta still exist, could females have possibly gained something like an
unfair advantage?
It seems like the
American woman is being squeezed at both ends.
Allie Lane is a soon-to-be graduate of the University of New Hampshire with degrees in English and German. Her main academic interests are creative writing and literary translation. She grew up in Derry, New Hampshire, enjoys books, movies and the outdoors. She has, on occasion, been referred to as a Good Egg.
Allie Lane is a soon-to-be graduate of the University of New Hampshire with degrees in English and German. Her main academic interests are creative writing and literary translation. She grew up in Derry, New Hampshire, enjoys books, movies and the outdoors. She has, on occasion, been referred to as a Good Egg.

What are your thoughts on colleges and universities that are all women and do not allow men, such as Simmons and Russell Sage? Wouldn't that be in the same league as a golf club being men only?
ReplyDeleteConsidering the thousands of years of human history during which women were in most cultures considered second class citizens, or worse, my personal reaction to all-female colleges would be "good for you, if that's what you want to do, then why not."
ReplyDeleteIf males get to do it, then why shouldn't females get the chance.
I agree with you Tom. My thinking is that if we are supportive of all-female colleges and organizations, then we should also be supportive of all-men colleges, clubs, organizations, etc. It should be about fair treatment. If a club is a private club, then they have a right to set their own rules. But the question I have is where is the line drawn? Does that mean private organizations and firms can discriminate based on your sex and not hire you because you're a man or woman? If you can't discriminate for hiring procedures, then why can you discriminate for clubs and colleges?
ReplyDelete